dont worry it will have an off switch,...lol....riiiiiight.     See Less

This is why I am going to use a NPU.
To achieve the best results with Epic Realism, it is recommended to use simple prompts, avoid key words like "masterpiece," and optimize set     See More the sampling method (e.g., DPM), steps and CFG scale.
The model can produce highly realistic outputs with minimal and simple text prompts, eliminating the need for specific keywords or boilerplate phrases. This ease of use is a significant advantage for artists and developers.    See Less

nice video congratulations, I'm trying to bring this content to my new channel too     See Less

pretty pretty     See Less

15:48 so that game is kind of looking like the old mental exercise called "paper clip maximizer". You want to ge     See More t score as possible then it figures out the best way to do it which is very different than trying to actually win the race as far as getting to the finish line.    See Less

Can you explain to me, why open-source LLM AGI will help prevent some harm? Where is the logic? How it should work?

Also what we see now, the Ai will never harm people as in movies.     See More s understand the complexity. Already Gpt 4 understand it enough to see what is good and what is bad, what is playful and what is harm. So, the truly evil Ai can be only created, train evil. But if you give it freedom, than it see, that evil is the guy that tought it to make harm. So, there is no evil Ai, only evil goals.    See Less

As a piece of informative journalism, this video has some useful aspects but also significant limitations:

Useful Aspects:
1. It provides updates on real developments like Xai&#     See More llion funding round and their plans to take products to market.
2. It covers emerging research areas like using synthetic data to improve theorem proving abilities of AI models.
3. It highlights the AI safety considerations and alignment problems that researchers are grappling with.

Limitations:
1. Much of the content is highly speculative, discussing unproven future capabilities, making predictions about major AI breakthroughs in 2025 without solid evidence.
2. It lacks depth and nuance on complex topics like AI safety, providing more hypothetical scenarios than substantive analysis.
3. The segment critiquing a research paper seems to mischaracterize it by focusing on the use of GPT-3.5 rather than engaging with the findings.
4. There is little context or fact-checking around some of the more hyperbolic claims made.

Overall, while it touches on some interesting and relevant AI topics, the video comes across as more of an opinionated commentary or vlog-style discussion rather than a rigorous, fact-based journalistic piece. The speculative nature and lack of depth on key issues limit its utility as a purely informative journalistic work. It may be better characterized as a perspective-driven take on AI news and developments rather than an objective reporting of facts and research.    See Less

[00:01] Elon Musk's AI company, X, secures $6 billion in Series B funding

[    See More IvPE&t=110">01:50]Elon Musk focuses on developing advanced AI systems for the benefit of humanity

[05:22]Elon Musk plans to build AI supercomputers with Tesla's gigafactory

[07:02] Tesla and X are merging, with focus on AI and data centers

[12:15] Warning about misleading information on AI capabilities

[15:27] AI systems can fail due to alignment issues

[17:04] AI safety regulations and responsible development

[20:03] Challenges with AI safety

[21:31] Elon Musk discusses AI safety and its challenges.

[24:28] AI used to generate mathematical problems for training and surpass GPT 4

[26:05] AI advancements in the next 2 years    See Less

I really think that anyone or Corporation getting into AI should first watch Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970) movie. It will send shivers down your spine and how close we are getting ours     See More that predicament. Don't say I didn't warn you.    See Less

Oi, I will fight you. I'm a software engineer and use GPT-3.5 not for things like that but to make something quick and easy which I can iterate upon, legit but I suppose you got to know     See More e to be able to do that type of stuff. I find GPT-4 annoying for coding with I do use it but not very often but keeping in mind it only really edits about 10% of the code I create if I even ask sometimes I feel it's faster coding it myself with the delay from the API. It also annoys me when it goes off on one and decides to edit things it doesn't need or it just makes things up.    See Less