8:28 If you see such comments its always a mid Dev who lost his Job as of AI is better now xD     See Less

15:12 your voice goes into another dimension 😅     See Less

Ur vids are somewhat interesting, but if you don't stop with the ShockJock misleading clickbait "BREAKING NEWS" type titles for ur shit, ima take back my subscribe and block ur     See More . Just like this vid ... What? Is exactly over? When was the contest, and Who lost what?
The answer is Jack Shit. The tip of the AI iceberg has just shown a small glimpse of what's to come in the near and distant future. Nothings over but has instead just gotten started. It's has and is expected to continue to advance at an unbelievable rate and all the leaders of the field are simply 1 up'ing each other daily. And will continue to do so at a faster and faster rate for a long time before it even slows down, let alone be over. So just shoot your shit straight, keep us all abreast of new developments and we will all be keeping up together. So next time a much more suitable vid title would be... Check out the newest and latest development in this weeks evolution of AI. After all, aside from the title, thats all this vid IS in reality. But most importantly, thats perfectly ok and something to continue looking forward to on the ongoing basis so if you could find ways to create excitement with what it is,... rather than with what it's not...
that'd be really nice
✌️    See Less

First model that could create correct 3000 word synopsis of my unpublished 95 000 word novel, and answer various questions on its plot and figure out which character is "immortal"     See More h various historic periods. Google 4o Deep Research fucked it up, thinking for 20 minutes. This did perfectly in 3 mins or so... For me it is a paradigm shift. It is still not good at writing books, I asked it to create a similarly themed and plotted book as mine and said it should be 90 000 words, but it gave me just 50 000 character straight detective story while my book mixes genres and there is sci-fi and historic narratives, but you cannot have everything... But getting all the context from 90 000 word novel without hallucination is wow    See Less

15:50 trust me, a human programmer would not have debugged this much code in 3 cycles.     See Less

Yes i was working on theoretical physics with all other pro ais and then along came gemini 2.5. It went from working with a bunch of delusional cheerleaders to a serious phd level scientist.     See Less

The 1M context window has already been game-changing for many use-cases. And this just opens up more!     See Less

It's not perfect. It swore that a library I wss using contained something it didn't, but to it's credit - it helped me get the app made, where as o3 mini high failed entirely     See Less

So i tested Gemini 2.5 today. I tried making something random, a neural network 3D simulator. I got the main code from Gemini but got ot working with Claude. This will require more testing,     See More ..    See Less

Blood Bowl? Wes... what's your NAF number? @WesRoth?     See Less