EXCELLENT video!

The Apple researchers are morons. Perhaps it was a subtle defense of Apple's stupidity with all things AI, after all, if there's not too much to current mode     See More s Apple didn't drop the ball on AI.

FIRE TIM COOK NOW!    See Less

For once, Apple isn't wrong     See Less

I'm critical of apple but they are 100% right here. LLMs are good at things like programming and generating dialog. There is no conceptual understanding.     See Less

I don't know how anyone could recommend any google AI running on googles servers.. local AI is a different story     See Less

Apple is ahead of the game here.

They’re letting all these other companies invest 10s of billions and then they’ll swoop in and implement the technology at little cost.

No     See More ing to stop buying iPhones.    See Less

That's just Apple trying to cope and downplay all their AI screw ups     See Less

I just wanna remind everybody here that Apple owns the most AI companies they own more than Meta more than Google and more than Microsoft so this is beyond embarrassing     See Less

Following semiotics doesn’t LLMs reinforce the hegemonic law unless trained by ontological or perhaps pluralistic modalities or a decolonial lens?     See Less

Wow, as if Apple really needed to prove how behind on AI they are xD Like what is this, day one after GPT 3.5? Did literally anyone not know this?     See Less

LLMs will never replicate the abilities of humans. They are a TYPE of intelligence that is completely different than any other we have dealt with before. It's going to be poor at some th     See More uch better than humans at others.

It does think, just not how humans think. Have you seen O3 reasoning out an answer before it gives its final answer? It's chaining several different thoughts, and then making an answer.

"Is it thinking..." Or any other question like this is the wrong question, because you are trying to graph a human, or even animal, framework of intelligence to something that is radically different.    See Less